This is where I want to live... Roger Dean's house for the new millennium. I love the organic curves and tranquility of the design. Such a house would feel calm, peaceful and safe after the sharp angles and harsh lines of the modern rectilinear architecture we're obliged to suffer through lack of choice. If I had enough money I would commission a Dean house. Even better, I read on his site that Dean is working on a blue print for a complete village to be built according to his Utopian ideals. I want to live in Willowater!
I picked up an interesting, and quite scary, fact from the RAC's annual "cost of motoring index" recently. The average family car now costs £5,627 per year to keep on the road (that's 11,455.71 US dollars at current conversion rates)
Sounds a hell of a lot, doesn't it? The good news is that it's actually a drop to the same level as two years ago, partly due to growing fuel-efficiency of vehicles. The bad news is that the government is alarmed because the fall in car running costs is unlikely to persuade motorists to make greater use of public transport, which in turn means the government is unlikely to meet its environmental targets.
But the one thing successive governments have failed to take on board is that to encourage "greater use of public transport" there actually needs to be a public transport system that's affordable and accessible to a majority of people. The drive to promote public transport can't and won't work while bus and train fares continue to rise (why pay £200 to go to London on the train when the petrol to make the journey by car would cost £20?) and rural or unprofitable routes are limited or non-existant. Giving up the car to make the world a better place is a wonderful concept, but walking, biking, or taking the one bus a day simply isn't a feasible option for many people.
At one time, Britain had a rail and canal transportation network that was the envy of the world. But then the abundance of cheap fossil fuel energy made car ownership available to all, and the whole transportation infrastructure changed. Railway stations were axed, more roads were built. Freight moved off the railways and canals onto the roads. As people bought cars, they no longer lived and worked in the same locale but commuted in the comfort of their own vehicles. Modern urban planning changed to accomodate our new mobility, and became designed for maximum car use.
So now we just can't get anywhere without our own transport. We can't do the grocery shopping because the supermarkets are outside towns in huge retail parks. We can't even go to the cinema in the evening because the multiplex too is outside town. We can't walk to work because we don't live in city centres anymore, but in cosy suburbs miles away, and we can't catch a bus or train because there aren't to speak of any outside urban areas.
Giving up cars would require major lifestyle changes for most of us. We'd have to go back to living in urban centres close to where we work. Outside-of-town superstores and entertainment facilities would have to move back into town. And most importantly - there would need to be a cheap and efficient system of public transport. You don't have to be a cynic to know this isn't going to happen...
I hate driving and the impact it has on my environment and I would happily exchange the comforts and privacy of my own personal little metal box for an alternative, but since there isn't an alternative, I have to be a realistic, but guilty, car driver.
Sounds a hell of a lot, doesn't it? The good news is that it's actually a drop to the same level as two years ago, partly due to growing fuel-efficiency of vehicles. The bad news is that the government is alarmed because the fall in car running costs is unlikely to persuade motorists to make greater use of public transport, which in turn means the government is unlikely to meet its environmental targets.
But the one thing successive governments have failed to take on board is that to encourage "greater use of public transport" there actually needs to be a public transport system that's affordable and accessible to a majority of people. The drive to promote public transport can't and won't work while bus and train fares continue to rise (why pay £200 to go to London on the train when the petrol to make the journey by car would cost £20?) and rural or unprofitable routes are limited or non-existant. Giving up the car to make the world a better place is a wonderful concept, but walking, biking, or taking the one bus a day simply isn't a feasible option for many people.
At one time, Britain had a rail and canal transportation network that was the envy of the world. But then the abundance of cheap fossil fuel energy made car ownership available to all, and the whole transportation infrastructure changed. Railway stations were axed, more roads were built. Freight moved off the railways and canals onto the roads. As people bought cars, they no longer lived and worked in the same locale but commuted in the comfort of their own vehicles. Modern urban planning changed to accomodate our new mobility, and became designed for maximum car use.
So now we just can't get anywhere without our own transport. We can't do the grocery shopping because the supermarkets are outside towns in huge retail parks. We can't even go to the cinema in the evening because the multiplex too is outside town. We can't walk to work because we don't live in city centres anymore, but in cosy suburbs miles away, and we can't catch a bus or train because there aren't to speak of any outside urban areas.
Giving up cars would require major lifestyle changes for most of us. We'd have to go back to living in urban centres close to where we work. Outside-of-town superstores and entertainment facilities would have to move back into town. And most importantly - there would need to be a cheap and efficient system of public transport. You don't have to be a cynic to know this isn't going to happen...
I hate driving and the impact it has on my environment and I would happily exchange the comforts and privacy of my own personal little metal box for an alternative, but since there isn't an alternative, I have to be a realistic, but guilty, car driver.
